This study is aimed at examining the ethical values of EMT students. The results below are based on the revised questionnaires, which can be applicable to EMT from the original questionnaires developed by Lee(1990), with a sample of 124 students consisting of 63 first and 61 second year students, conducted November 2-8, 2001.
Data were analyzed using SPSS in terms of means, standard deviations, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
The results are as follows;
1. In the area of Human life, all subjects showed utilitarian disposition. All respondents perceived the item “When patients recognizing there is no hope for survival ask for euthanasia, it is ethically right to accommodate their opinions.” as the most utilitarian item, whereas they perceived the item “When an hopeless patient is on cardiac arrest, it is ethically right to do CPR as the most deontoogical item.
2. In the area of patient relationship, all students of two groups took on deontoogical characteristics, but there were no statistically significant differences between two groups.
All students perceived an item “EMT have to keep it secret if patients disclose their suicide intentions and ask for absolute secrecy” the most utilitarian item, whereas they perceived an item “Even though patients act and speak in a very rude manner, EMT people should do their best to provide care for patients.” as the most deontoogical item.
3. In the area of task relationship, first year students perceived an item “Given time limitations, it is ethically right to give priority to the patients who can be rehabilitated over the patients who can’t be fully recovered.” as the most utilitarian item, whereas second year students perceived an item “Under no circumstances should any placebo be administered to patients.” as the most utilitarian item. All students perceived an item “When EMT students see an unconscious person lying in the street, they have to give him/her emergency treatment.” as the most deontoogical item.
4. In the area of coworker relationship, all students of two groups took on deontoogical disposition, but there were no significant differences between two groups.
All students of two groups perceived an item “Suppose you are regarded as the person who would be promoted. However, you think that your coworker is more competent than you. In that case you should tell your supervisor about your coworker.” as the most utilitarian item. First year students perceived an item, whereas second year students perceived an item “When you observe coworkers’ misconduct at work, it is ethically right to ignore their misdeeds.” as the most deontoogical item.
5. This study demonstrated that for the first year students, there is a correlational relationship between areas of human life and task relationship, and between areas of task relationship and coworker relationship, whereas for the second year students, there is a correlational relationship between areas of human life and task relationship.
6. In areas of human life and task relationship, there are significant differences according to attitudes toward EMT and attendance at ethics training sessions. In the area of coworker relationship, there are significant differences according to religion, attendance at ethics training sessions, and a code of ethics.
Recommendations for future research,
1. Sample items to measure ethical values and the instrument tailored to the needs of EMT should be developed.
2. A longitudinal study to track ethical value changes according to the amount of work experience is needed.
3. A code of ethics and/or ethics training, which could apply in actual situations, should be implemented.
|